ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Understanding the behavioral intentions of MaaS during public health events.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mobility as a Service (MaaS) integrates various modes of transportation, provides personalized travel services for travelers, and improves the efficiency of traditional travel modes. To examine the mechanisms underlying the impact of sudden public health events on the behavioral intentions to use MaaS and provide theoretical support for the sustainable development of MaaS, this research investigates the Beijing MaaS program as a case. Methods: A total of 630 questionnaires were collected. Theoretical model, sourced from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, is employed to elucidate the influence of six variables-performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, ambiguity tolerance, perceived health threat, and policy cognition-on the behavioral intentions of MaaS. Results: The results show that three variables from the UTAUT positively impact behavioral intention and that there is a significant mediating effect of policy cognition on the relationship between these variables and the intention to use. Travelers with a high level of ambiguity tolerance are more inclined to use MaaS, while the perceived health threat reduces the intentions. Discussion: Multigroup analysis revealed differences in effort expectancy, ambiguity Toleance, and perceived health threat among the various groups. The research findings may provide theoretical guidance and empirical evidence for the promotion strategies of MaaS and for the formulation of related policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.