Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845520›Full record

ArticleDigital health

The engagement of healthcare providers in implementing the selfBACK randomised controlled trial - A mixed-methods process evaluation.

Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, Barbara I Nicholl, Karen Wood, Frances S Mair, Paul Jarle Mork, Karen Søgaard, Charlotte Dn Rasmussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette Jensen StochkendahlDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-8267
Barbara I NichollSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-0130
Karen WoodSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-0384
Frances S MairSchool of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-1135
Paul Jarle MorkDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-2680
Karen SøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3968-6364
Charlotte Dn RasmussenThe National Research Centre for The Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-717X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with low back pain (LBP) are often recommended to self-manage their condition, but it can be challenging without support. Digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promise in supporting self-management of LBP, but little is known about healthcare providers' (HCPs) engagement in implementing these. Aims: We aimed to examine HCPs' engagement in patient recruitment for the selfBACK app clinical trial and explore their perceptions of the app. Methods: In a mixed-methods design, we conducted a process evaluation alongside the selfBACK trial, triangulating quantitative data from trial recruitment logs and a vignette-based survey, and qualitative data from trial procedure documents, interviews with HCPs, and survey free-text responses. From 2019 to 2020, we recruited 57 HCPs from Norway and 39 health clinics in Denmark and collected quantitative and qualitative data in parallel. Results were integrated using displays. Results: Overall, 825 patients were recruited by the HCPs. The vignette-based survey showed high agreement among HCPs (n = 62) with the self-management plans generated by the app (84.1-88.9%) but also highlighted concerns about tailoring and content. Interviews with HCPs (n = 19) revealed challenges with recruitment due to busy schedules, competing tasks, and varying levels of interest and engagement in the study. Conclusions: The study identified factors that impact HCPs' engagement in recruiting patients for the selfBACK trial and highlighted overall positive views of the selfBACK app, although some concerns about the content and tailoring of the app were raised. Understanding HCP motivations and workload is crucial for the successful implementation of DHIs in clinical practice.

Indexed as

clinical trialdigital healthhealthcare providersLow back painmHealthprimary health careself-management

Identifiers

PMID39845520
PMCPMC11752214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.