ArticleSurgery in practice and science2025
Is there an impact of surgeon's experience on in-hospital outcome in patients with operatively treated proximal humerus and humerus shaft fractures?
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proximal humerus and shaft fractures are common, comprising 10-11 % of all fractures. Progress in their management includes refined surgical techniques and implants, coupled with a deeper understanding of fracture patterns. Aims: This study examines the effect of surgical education on in-hospital outcomes for operatively treated proximal and humerus shaft fractures, aiming to enhance patient care and results. Material and Methods: This study analyzed cases from 1st of January 2010 until the 31st of December 2021 using data extracted from the Swiss working group for quality assurance in surgery, including patients with proximal humerus and shaft fractures who underwent surgical procedures like open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF), closed reduction with internal fixation (CRIF), external fixation, or prosthesis. Analysis included patient demographics, procedure details, and outcomes, comparing those with and without teaching of the surgical procedures. Binary logistic regression identified risk factors, with statistical significance set at Results: A total of 6,654 patients were analyzed. Most were treated with ORIF (74 %) or CRIF (17 %). The average hospital stay was 6.5 days. Teaching surgeries, comprising 5.4 % of all procedures, were more common among patients with fewer comorbidities and with public insurance coverage. These surgeries took slightly longer to perform compared to non-teaching cases (120±65 min vs. 113±60 min, Conclusions: Educational status did not affect in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients with a operatively treated shaft or proximal humeral fracture. However, teaching was an independent predictor of a prolonged duration of surgery. Despite the significant differences, the clinical outcome was comparable in both groups, therefore substantiating the advantages of teaching operations for both patient safety and resident education. They combine the competence of experienced surgeons with the training of residents, whilst ensuring the safety through oversight and best practices. Not only does this environment improve patient outcomes, but also provides residents with hands-on experience, thus helping them make critical decisions, building confidence and developing essential skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.