ReviewSurgery in practice and science2025
Surgical sharp debridement alongside maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs): A systematic review of case reports.
Review in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this systematic review of case reports is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining surgical sharp debridement with maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported on the use of surgical sharp debridement alongside MDT for DFUs, while exclusion criteria included insufficient detail on treatment methods or patient outcomes, non-human studies, and non-English publications. Data were extracted using a standardized form, and the quality of case reports was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to the anticipated heterogeneity of the case reports, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: The review process began with 1003 records, which were narrowed down to 721 unique records after removing duplicates. Following title and abstract screening, and full-text assessment, 8 studies were selected for inclusion in the final analysis. The narrative synthesis identified several key findings, including significant wound size reduction, improved glycemic control, disappearance of foul odor, improved healing rates, infection control, granulation tissue formation, epithelialization, complete wound closure, avoidance of amputation, and pain alleviation. The combination therapy showed promise in managing DFUs effectively. Conclusion: The systematic review of case reports presents evidence supporting the combined use of surgical sharp debridement and maggot debridement therapy in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. The findings suggest that this approach can lead to successful wound healing and limb preservation, offering a valuable addition to the clinician's toolkit for treating DFUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.