ArticleSurgery in practice and science2025
Operating room times differ for surgical fixation of metacarpal fractures: An analysis of two principally different techniques.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Time spent in the operating room (OR) has ramifications that impact patient outcomes and the economics of patients, physicians, surgery centers, and insurance industry. For that reason, there is an incentive to seek approaches that allow shorter times to be spent in the OR. To what extent varying routine techniques impact on operating times has not been extensively studied in metacarpal fixation literature, specifically investigating retrograde threaded intramedullary nail fixations (RTNF) and comparing it to open plating fixations (OPF). The present study was designed for the purpose of comparing OR times for different but broadly adopted techniques for internal stabilization of metacarpal shaft fractures. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients aged 18 and above, who over a 41-month period underwent internal fixation with RTNF or OPF for single, extra articular, closed fractures of the index through little finger metacarpals. We examined anesthesia records, which indicated total operating ("skin-to-skin") times. Results: A total of 81 charts remained for review after exclusions. Statistical analysis of the recorded data showed significantly shorter median OR time values for RTNF (17 minutes, IQR = 14 - 20.75) vs. OPF (36 minutes, IQR = 31.55 - 44; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Statistical analysis of data shows significantly shorter operating times to achieve satisfactory fracture stabilization using RTNF compared to OPF. Since the differences in OR time significantly differ between the two principally different surgical techniques, it should be considered when choosing which surgical technique to use. However, further review of indications and clinical outcomes is necessary to develop definitive recommendations or guidelines on which technique should be preferred, especially when considering specific patient presentations. Level of Evidence: Retrospective Comparative Study III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.