Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845381›Full record

ArticleSurgery in practice and science2023

Ten year analysis of missed injuries at a major trauma centre in South Africa.

Howard Wain, Damian L Clarke, Shelley Wall, Wanda Bekker, Victor Kong, John L Bruce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Howard WainUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Department of Surgery, South Africa.
Damian L ClarkeUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Department of Surgery, South Africa.
Shelley WallUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Department of Surgery, South Africa.
Wanda BekkerUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Department of Surgery, South Africa.
Victor KongUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Department of Surgery, South Africa.
John L BruceUniversity of KwaZulu Natal, Department of Surgery, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This analysis retrospectively reviews a tertiary trauma service's experience with missed injuries over a decade. Methods: The Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) has accumulated electronic data on all admissions since 2012. This data informs the monthly morbidity and mortality conference, where adverse events are discussed. Records of all missed injuries were reviewed. Results: During the study period there were 17 254 individual patient admissions and 4 624 surgical procedures. A total of 159 missed injuries were identified. Ninety-six were injuries missed on investigation; 60 were missed on CT, 27 missed on x-ray, 1 on blood test, and 8 occurred during an unknown investigation. Thirty-nine injuries were missed during surgery; including thirteen colonic, five small bowel, five gastric, four duodenal, three vascular and three diaphragmatic injuries. Twenty-four injuries were missed on initial assessment, the majority of which were soft tissue injuries. Intraoperative missed injuries resulted in the greatest morbidity. Conclusion: Missed injuries remain a problem in modern trauma care. Injuries missed during initial clinical assessment and on imaging must be excluded by detailed secondary surveys and in depth review of all imaging. Injuries missed at operation carry greater morbidity than those missed outside the operating room. Ongoing vigilance is necessary to reduce the incidence of these injuries.

Indexed as

InterpretationMissedMissed injuryPatient safetyTrauma

Identifiers

PMID39845381
PMCPMC11749956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.