ArticleSurgery in practice and science2024
Impact of fecal diversion in Perineal Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection on disease survival: A large retrospective study.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rectus-based Stoma and Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Laterality Planning for Perineal-Anal Defects After Hemipelvectomy.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Surgical fecal diversionWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Core outcome set for research in necrotising soft tissue infection patients: an international, multidisciplinary, modified Delphi consensus study.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Article
- Fournier's gangrene in a woman with chronic neutropenia presenting at 12 weeks of pregnancy: a case report and literature review.Case reports in women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colostomy is usually proposed during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene, nevertheless its impact on disease outcome remains still debated. We conducted a retrospective study in an academic center to determine the impact of fecal diversion on disease morbidity and specific survival. Methods: All medical charts of Fournier Gangrene cases in the past 30-years were reviewed. Mortality rate, hospitalization duration, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries were compared between the stoma and the non-stoma groups. Time between initial diagnosis and stoma creation, type of fecal diversion, as well as specific morbidity were analyzed. Results: Of 89 patients included, 59 had stoma creation. Stoma group had significant higher catecholamine drugs use. Mortality, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries did not significantly differ between both groups. Hospitalization duration was significantly higher in the stoma group. Mortality and hospitalization duration were higher when loop transverse colostomy was performed, and when colostomy was done in the first 3-days. Morbidity occurred in 41 % of patients with colostomy, with 25 % life-threatening complications. 31 % of colostomies remained definitive, while median time to intestinal recovery was 159-days. Discussion: Consistently with current literature, disease survival was not improved by colostomy creation although skewed. Colostomy creation was associated with a higher hospitalization duration and a significant morbidity including risk of definitive stoma. To limit over-indicated stoma and improve early results, a damage control strategy using colostomy creation is advised. Conclusion: The benefit of colostomy during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene was uncertain, with no clear impact on mortality. In fact, colostomy was associated with increased hospitalization duration and specific morbidity. Finally, when fecal diversion is deemed necessary, we advocate for coelioscopic delayed loop left colostomy. Alternative minimally invasive treatment as bowel catheters should also be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.