ArticleSurgery in practice and science2024
Variation in approach for midsize (4-6cm) ventral hernias across a statewide quality improvement collaborative.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Repair of midsize (4-6 cm) ventral hernias is challenging given lack of guidelines. Within this context, we sought to characterize surgical approach among patients undergoing repair of midsize ventral hernias within the only population-level, clinically-nuanced hernia registry in the US. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR). MSQC-COHR is the only US population-level registry that captures clinically-nuanced data pertaining to patient hernia characteristics. We included patients who underwent repair of a 4-6 cm hernia from January 1, 2020-June 30, 2022. We stratified repair type as open or minimally invasive and used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with MIS approach. Secondary outcomes included complications rate. Results: Among 771 patients, mean hernia width (SD) was 4.7 cm (0.8) and 339 (44 %) underwent MIS approach. Patients with MIS approach had lower BMI (33.5 vs 34.8, Conclusion: Among patients with midsize hernias, few patient-level factors are associated with approach. This may indicate that surgeon preference factors largely into this decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.