SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
The accuracy of radiomics in diagnosing tumor deposits and perineural invasion in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for the prediction of synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiomics has emerged as a promising approach for diagnosing, treating, and evaluating the prognosis of various diseases in recent years. Some investigators have utilized radiomics to create preoperative diagnostic models for tumor deposits (TDs) and perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer (RC). However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive, evidence-based support for the diagnostic performance of these models. Thus, the accuracy of radiomic models was assessed in diagnosing preoperative RC TDs and PNI in this study. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles from their establishment up to December 11, 2023. The radiomics quality score (RQS) was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the methodological quality and research level of the included studies. Results: This meta-analysis included 15 eligible studies, most of which employed logistic regression models (LRMs). For diagnosing TDs, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on radiomic features (RFs) alone were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79 - 0.90), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70 - 0.89); in the validation set, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on both RFs and interpretable CFs were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.91), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.72 - 0.99), and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.76), respectively. For diagnosing PNI, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on RFs alone were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.86), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44 - 0.80), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68 - 0.87) in the validation set; in the validation set, the c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of models based on both RFs and interpretable CFs were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.89), 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48 - 0.71), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84 - 0.94), respectively. Conclusions: Diagnostic models based on both RFs and CFs have proven effective in preoperatively diagnosing TDs and PNI in RC. This non-invasive method shows promise as a new approach. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=498660, identifier CRD42024498660.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.