ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Indications for chemoradiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer in Japan: a questionnaire survey in the JCOG head and neck cancer study group.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multicenter randomized phase III trial of weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma unfit for high-dose cisplatin: JCOG2405 (ELDER-WEEKLY).Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Trial
- Review
- Advancing personalised oncologic care for older adults with head and neck cancer through structured international collaboration.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with concurrent high-dose cisplatin (CDDP) is one of the standard treatment options for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Since the indications specific to the older population have not been reported, we conducted a multicenter survey on the indications. Methods: In April and May 2023, a questionnaire survey was emailed to all institutions belonging to the JCOG-HNCSG, consisting of 37 institutions. Results: The major factors influencing the indications for high-dose CDDP were renal function and performance status (PS). The majority agreed that the treatment is administered to patients aged 65-74 years with PS 0-1 and 65-74 years with eGFR ≥60 (ml/ min/1.73m2), and not in patients aged ≥75 years with PS 2, ≥80 years with PS 1, and ≥65 years with eGFR <60. Regarding weekly CDDP, the majority agreed that the treatment is not conducted in patients aged ≥75 years with PS 2, ≥65 years with eGFR <40, and ≥70 years with eGFR <50. Discussion: In Japan, where CRT is actively performed even among older people, a survey was conducted to determine its indications. Renal function and PS were considered important, and comorbidities, such as heart failure, were considered while determining the indication. These results will help define the eligibility criteria for prospective studies on CRT in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.