ReviewJAMIA open2025
Accuracy of privacy preserving record linkage for real world data in the United States: a systemic review.
Review in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of an XGBoost-based privacy preserving record linkage system compared with an electronic health record patient matching module in identifying patients shared between nearby academic health centers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Re-identification risk for common privacy preserving patient matching strategies when shared with de-identified demographics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- EUPID-configurable privacy-preserving record linkage in federated health data spaces.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- Linking clinical trial data with real-world data for enhanced clinical evidence generation: methodological considerations and recommendations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Making human derived data FAIR: feedback from NCI office of data sharing workshop.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Leveraging real-world data for safety signal detection and risk management in pre- and post-market settings.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Examine the accuracy of privacy preserving record linkage (PPRL) matches in real world data (RWD). Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify articles evaluating PPRL methods from January 1, 2013 to June 15, 2023. Eligible studies included original research reporting quantitative metrics such as precision and recall in health-related data sources. Covidence software was used to manage the review process. Results: Five studies met our inclusion criteria. Tokenization and hash functions were used to hash and encrypt personally identifiable information (PII) including first and last names, dates of birth (DOB), and Social Security Numbers (SSNs) in a variety of RWD. All identified studies utilized deterministic matching. Combinations of tokenized or hashed PII that included "quasi-identifiers" like names and DOBs had consistently high precision (>95%) but lower recall, likely due to misspelled or inconsistently spelled names and name changes. SSN-based combinations demonstrated high precision but variable recall due to incomplete SSN data in RWD. Studies that employed algorithms in which at least one match was identified from a specified set of PII combinations provided high precision and high recall. Discussion: The systematic review indicates that PPRL methods generally provide highly accurate patient data linkage while maintaining privacy. Conclusions: Researchers should carefully consider the completeness and stability of each PII element selected for PPRL and may want to employ a strategy that allows for patient records to be matched if they meet at least one of several combinations of PII.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.