ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Auditory Perception Scores Following Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children From Different Regions Using Neubio's Full-Spectrum Continuous Stimulation.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesThe study aimed to compare the auditory perception status of children from different socioeconomic backgrounds, specifically urban versus rural. It also examined the correlation between outcome measures and the frequency of auditory verbal therapy sessions attended, as well as the impact of continuous electric analog stimulation on the age of implantation. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study was carried out on 30 children who have received unilateral cochlear implantation in rural versus urban backgrounds. Revised category of auditory perception (CAP) scores and meaningful auditory-integration scale (MAIS) were compared at set time frequencies of pre-switch on, three months, six months, and nine months post-implantation between the two groups of implanted children. Results: Revised CAP and MAIS scores showed improvement over time with auditory verbal therapy. Both groups of implantees showed better improvement irrespective of the background. The children implanted more than five years of age showed a significant improvement over time with continuous electric analog signals. Conclusion: Intensive rehabilitation is essential for children who have received cochlear implantation in which their required needs are addressed individually and optimized for the best outcomes. The study shows that hearing from the implant can be improved and have meaning with the help of auditory verbal therapy for optimal frequency irrespective of the background to a notable extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.