Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845240›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Massive Pulmonary Embolism With Negative D-dimer: A Case Report.

Usamah Al-Anbagi, Abdulrahman Saad, Tarek Ibrahim, Abdulqadir J Nashwan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Usamah Al-AnbagiInternal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Abdulrahman SaadMedicine, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, QAT.
Tarek IbrahimPharmacy, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Abdulqadir J NashwanNursing & Midwifery Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a critical condition that arises when clots migrate to the lungs, obstructing pulmonary circulation and posing a significant risk to the patient's health. While the D-dimer test is useful for excluding PE, it is not infallible. This report describes a case where extensive PE was present despite the patient having a normal D-dimer level, emphasizing the importance of a thorough clinical evaluation. Our case is that of a 36-year-old male patient with a known history of acromegaly. He presented to the emergency department with a cough, shortness of breath, and high-grade fever and was ultimately diagnosed with a massive bilateral PE. Despite a negative D-dimer result and a low probability based on the Wells score, the diagnosis was confirmed by a CT pulmonary angiogram. This case report raises questions about the sensitivity and safety of a negative D-dimer result in ruling out acute PE. Clinical judgment, combined with imaging, is essential for an accurate diagnosis in high-risk cases to avoid missing life-threatening conditions like PE.

Indexed as

acromegalyanticoagulationcomputed tomography (ct scan)d-dimerpulmonary embolism (pe)rivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID39845240
PMCPMC11753817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.