Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845232›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Factors Influencing the Achievement of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Observational Study in Yemen.

Alameen Alnoor, Yasser A Obadiel, Khalil A Saleh, Haitham M Jowah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alameen AlnoorSurgery, Sana'a University, Sana'a City, YEM.
Yasser A ObadielSurgery, Sana'a University, Sana'a City, YEM.
Khalil A SalehSurgery, Republican Teaching Hospital Authority, Sana'a City, YEM.
Haitham M JowahSurgery, Sana'a University, Sana'a City, YEM.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The critical view of safety (CVS) is a critical technique to minimize the risk of bile duct injuries (BDIs) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study evaluated the rate of CVS achievement and examined factors influencing its success. Methods This prospective study included 97 patients undergoing LC. Data on demographic characteristics, preoperative factors, surgical difficulty, and surgeon experience were collected. CVS achievement was assessed using Strasberg's criteria, and associated factors were analyzed. Results CVS was successfully achieved in 31 of 97 cases (32%), while it was not achieved in 66 cases (68%). Factors significantly associated with failure to achieve CVS included previous abdominal surgery (p = 0.024), prior endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (p = 0.024), acute cholecystitis (p = 0.024), and higher difficulty grades according to the modified Nassar scale (p < 0.001). Although there was no statistically significant difference in CVS achievement between specialists and residents (p = 0.223), specialists had a higher success rate (37.5%) compared to residents (28%). Achieving CVS was associated with shorter operative times (mean: 60 vs. 70 minutes, p < 0.001) and reduced use of postoperative drains (16.1% vs. 83.9%, p < 0.001). Importantly, no BDIs were observed. Conclusion Achieving CVS remains a challenge, particularly in complex cases and patients with prior abdominal interventions or acute inflammation. Enhanced surgical training, meticulous preoperative planning, and the use of adjunctive technologies may improve CVS success rates and contribute to safer outcomes in LC.

Indexed as

bile duct injurycholecystectomy complicationscritical view of safetydifficulty gradinglaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID39845232
PMCPMC11751102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.