Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845223›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Distal Humerus Physeal Separation: Diagnostic Challenges and Implications.

Wan Lye Cheong, Norazian Kamisan, Imma Isniza Ismail

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wan Lye CheongOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MYS.
Norazian KamisanOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MYS.
Imma Isniza IsmailOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal humerus physeal separation is an uncommon and often misdiagnosed injury in infants and young children, frequently resulting in delayed treatment. We report three cases of distal humerus physeal separation that presented with different clinical scenarios with different management approaches. The first case describes a nine-month-old girl who was initially treated for presumed elbow cellulitis before presentation to our centre six weeks later. Conservative management, with further observation, noted remodelling of the distal humerus and full elbow range of motion (ROM) after 18 months. The second case involves a two-year-old girl with Kawasaki disease who underwent delayed closed reduction and percutaneous pinning after one week due to concurrent antiplatelet therapy. At four-month follow-up, there was cubitus varus deformity with slight limitation in elbow flexion. The third case is of a five-day-old male neonate with a right elbow deformity following an elective caesarean delivery at another hospital. Gentle manipulation was performed with a splint to improve alignment and immobilisation. The fracture united after five weeks. There was varus deformity but otherwise a full range of motion. These cases underscore the challenges in early diagnosis and management of distal humerus physeal separation in young children. Delayed treatment can lead to favourable outcomes, but follow-up is essential to observe for potential remodelling and residual deformity.

Indexed as

distal humerusepiphyseal separationepiphysiolysisphyseal separationtransphyseal fracture

Identifiers

PMID39845223
PMCPMC11752408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.