Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845148›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Image dataset: UAV images and ground data of one 'Bingo' mandarin and two 'Valencia' orange rootstock trials conducted in Florida.

Randall P Niedz, Kim D Bowman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Randall P NiedzAgricultural Research Service, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, 2001 South Rock Road, Ft. Pierce, FL, USA.
Kim D BowmanAgricultural Research Service, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, 2001 South Rock Road, Ft. Pierce, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The data are aerial images and ground tree measurement data of 3 citrus rootstock trials. Developing new citrus rootstock varieties requires field trials to test to identify selections with improved horticultural performance. A bud from a scion variety is grafted onto the rootstock and grown in a nursery until the grafted plant is ready to be planted in the field, which is in about one year. Trees in the field are assessed each year by measuring height, canopy diameter in 2 dimensions, overall health, and fruit number and quality factors when the trees begin to have a significant crop (∼3 years). Data collection of each tree is done manually. The image and ground data sets are of 3 rootstock trials that includes a 3-year-old Bingo mandarin hybrid trial of 206 trees, a 6-year-old Valencia orange trial of 643 trees, and a 7-year-old Valencia orange trials of 648 trees. Data for each trial includes aerial images and ground data of height, canopy diameters, and an overall health rating. The combination of ground validated measures and aerial images make this data set useful for building AI-based aerial image data collection applications. The data will be useful for 1) visualizing the effects of different rootstock selections and varieties on scion growth, effects that may not be fully captured with single measure metrics; and 2) development of image analysis applications and segmentation algorithms that can extract data from the images that are suitable for replacing some or all the ground measures.

Indexed as

Aerial imageryCitrusFlatwoodsPlant breedingRootstock breeding

Identifiers

PMID39845148
PMCPMC11750505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.