ArticleSurgery in practice and science2022
Validity of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Intestinal Obstruction Grading System.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The utility of a CT grading scale in deciding on surgical intervention for patients with suspected small bowel obstruction.Surgery open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading system for intestinal obstruction may be a useful measure of anatomic severity, but its construct validity has not yet been evaluated in patients with either large or small bowel obstruction, using the grade applicable at initial presentation (rather than after definitive management). Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of adult inpatients presenting with intestinal obstruction at our center during 2008-2014. We excluded patients without confirmed intestinal obstruction, those with obstruction secondary to a hernia, those who were treated for >24 hours at another hospital, and those with a previous encounter already included in the study. We measured inter-rater reliability using a weighted kappa coefficient. We used multivariable logistic regression, accounting for sampling weights, to assess the relationship of grades with complications, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission. Results: Of 287 patients, 165 (58%) had grade I anatomic severity, 75 (26%) grade II, 23 (8%) grade III, 15 (5%) grade IV, and 9 (3%) grade V. Forty-six (16%) patients had a large bowel obstruction. There was substantial inter-rater agreement in grades [weighted kappa 0.69 (95% CI 0.47-0.91)]. Compared to grade I, grades III-V [OR 12.2 (95% CI 2.26-66.2)] but not grade II [OR 2.04 (95% CI 0.79-5.28)] were associated with increased risk of a complication. grade II [OR 7.92 (95% CI 3.27-19.2)], but not grades III-V [OR 3.56 (95% CI 0.30-42.5)] was associated with increased 30-day mortality. Grades were not associated with increased 30-day readmission. Conclusions: AAST intestinal obstruction grades have predictive validity for some but not all outcomes, and may serve a useful role in the measurement of anatomic disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.