ArticleSurgery in practice and science2022
Surgical registrars' exposure to trauma laparotomy: A retrospective study from a level 1 trauma centre in New Zealand.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to review the experience of surgical registrars in performing trauma laparotomies at a level 1 trauma centre in New Zealand, and to benchmark this exposure against the current literature on the topic. Methods: A cohort study was conducted retrospectively at a level 1 trauma centre, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand. All patients (>15 years) who underwent a laparotomy for trauma between 2012 and 2020 were included. These patients were stratified by the study conductors retrospectively, according to each case's primary operator and compared the experience of each respective operator according to the time of day and by the mechanism of injury. Results: During the 9-year study period, a total of 204 trauma laparotomies were performed at Waikato Hospital. Of these 204 laparotomies, a consultant was present in 78% (160/204). In 27% of cases, a registrar was the primary operator with a consultant present (55/204), and in 22% of cases, the registrar was the primary operator with no consultant present (44/204). In 48%, a registrar assisted a consultant (98/204), and in 3%, a consultant performed the operation without a registrar assisting (7/204). Based on there being four registrars rotating through Waikato Hospital each 6-month cycle, this would imply that each registrar would be exposed to three trauma laparotomies each cycle. Conclusions: Despite significant institutional volumes, the exposure of individual New Zealand surgical registrars to trauma laparotomy is limited. In addition, most trauma laparotomies were performed by registrars as assistants rather than as primary operators. It is hoped that the newly launched Post Fellowship Education and Training (PFET) in trauma in Australasia will provide greater exposure to surgeons who will be managing trauma in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.