ArticleSurgery in practice and science2022
Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine follow-up for hip fracture patients after dynamic hip screw and intramedullary nail fixation.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rising number of hip fractures has incentivised several quality improvement initiatives aimed at improving outcomes. These include the national hip fracture audit and the best practice tariff. Whilst there is an established standard of care for inpatients, the optimal outpatient management of patients after hip fracture fixation remains undefined. We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine surgical appointments and provide evidence to support an improved outpatient hip fracture care pathway that focuses on more comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment. Methods: This study retrospectively examined all patients who underwent either dynamic hip screw or intramedullary nail fixation for hip fragility fracture at our hospital over a 3-year period. Data was obtained from the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD), the national integrated imaging system (NIMIS) and the medical charts. The number of outpatient appointments, postoperative radiographs and estimated cost of these patient encounters was examined. The rate of revision surgery as well as the type and timing of these interventions was also analysed. Results: We included 272 patients. The mean number of inpatient and outpatient radiographs was 1.13 and 1.54 per patient respectively. There were 428 outpatient appointments scheduled, an average of 1.6 (SD 1.5) per patient. The median length of stay was 12 days (IQR 8-17). Only 16 (5.8%) patients had abnormal X-ray findings and only 8 (2.9%) patients underwent revision surgery. The majority (15/16, 94%) of patients with surgical complications presented with significant symptoms. There was a 13.1% DNA rate resulting in a cost to the health service of €1,400. The combined total cost of follow-up for all patients over the 3 year period was €92,252. Discussion: Routine postoperative surgical encounters rarely alter a patient's management and contribute significantly to healthcare costs, resources and time loss for patients and their carers. We propose more selective follow-up protocols, adequately resourcing virtual alternatives and an improved outpatient hip fracture care pathway that focuses on comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment such as rehabilitation, fracture prevention and bone health optimisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.