ArticleHeliyon2025
An AI recognition method for children's clinical operative pain by skin potential (SP) signal.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective and rationale: Children's clinical pain phenotypes are complex, and there is a lack of objective biological diagnostic markers and cognitive patterns. Detecting physiological signals through wearable devices simplifies disease diagnosis and holds the potential for remote medical applications. Method and results: This research established a pain recognition model based on AI skin potential (SP) signal analysis. A total of 237 subjects participated in this study, comprising 152 boys and 85 girls, ranging in age from 2 to 16 years old. Initially, we preprocessed SP signals and built datasets for pain and non-pain conditions, including 195 pain and 97 non-pain samples. Then, we applied wavelet transform (WT) to capture the time-frequency characteristics of the signals and extract energy features and created a feature set comprising 30 features and selected 10 most relevant ones using the "SelectKBest" function.We compared six algorithms, optimized their parameters, and evaluated the stability and fitting performance of each algorithm. The random forest (RF) algorithm emerged as the best, demonstrating significant performance in pain recognition with an accuracy of 80.3 % and a sensitivity of 92 %. The SP signals generated by children of different genders, ages, and needling positions during indwelling needle puncture were accurately recognized. Conclusion: We developed a comprehensive SP recognition model, innovatively employing WT for SP signal analysis. This time-frequency analysis method, by preserving low-frequency features, is particularly suitable for SP signals. By combining pain monitoring with SP signals and ML, subjective pain experiences are transformed into quantifiable data, achieving high accuracy and real-time measurement capabilities. These advantages provide valuable technical support for clinical pediatric pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.