ArticleHeliyon2025
Definition of minimum clearance height of railway bridges in a windblown sand area based on numerical simulation.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Railway bridges with lower beam bottom clearances in windblown sand areas tend to accumulate sand particles on the sides of the beams, which seriously impacts railway safety. To investigate the effect of beam clearance height on wind-sand movement near the surface, and to determine the minimum clearance height for railway bridges in such areas, computational fluid dynamics using the Euler-Euler two-phase flow model was employed to simulate the wind-sand flow field beneath bridges with different heights. The results indicated that as clearance height increased, both the high-speed area above the bridge and acceleration area under the bridge increased, while the turbulence area on the leeward side remained unchanged. Furthermore, wind speed on the windward side did not decrease, and no deceleration zone near the surface was observed with increased clearance height. When the bridge height reached 9 m, the wind speed on the windward side no longer decreased. The correlation coefficients of near-surface wind speed under the bridge height of 9 m and above were consistent. As wind speed increased, the fluctuations in wind speed between bridges with different clearance heights became more pronounced, with differing variation trends. On the leeward side, lower clearance heights resulted in greater wind speed fluctuation. With higher wind speeds, the main position of wind speed deceleration moved further from the bridge. Therefore, the clearance height of bridges in the windblown area should be at least 9 m. These results provide a theoretical basis for the survey and design of bridges in the windblown sand areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.