ArticleHeliyon2025
Numerical and experimental analysis of body armor polymer penetration resistance against 7.62 mm bullet.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tensile Deformation and Transverse Strain Behavior of Carbon Black-UHMWPE Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced materials are crucial for enhancing soldier safety through improved personal body armor. In contrast to conventional Kevlar-epoxy composites, this study examines the ballistic performance of a unique ECO-UHMWPE (Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene) vest. The aim is to achieve a lightweight design with superior impact resistance, addressing limitations of the current armor used by the Ethiopian Defense Force. A comprehensive finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted using Abaqus explicit dynamics software to simulate the impact of 7.62 × 39 mm projectiles at various ranges (50m, 100m, 150m, and 200m). Material properties, laminate thickness, projectile velocity, and number of layers were systematically varied to assess their impact on vest performance. Results showed that ECO-UHMWPE vests exhibited significantly lower stress values and minimal deformation, particularly at close ranges with high projectile kinetic energy, outperforming Kevlar vests. Ballistic testing validated the FEA, with ECO-UHMWPE vests achieving a 22.44 % weight reduction (3.49 kg, 12 mm thick) compared to traditional Kevlar vests (4.5 kg, 15 mm thick) and offering a 30 % reduction in deformation and a 25 % increase in energy absorption. This analysis demonstrates the potential of ECO-UHMWPE for lighter, more effective body armor, paving the way for next-generation personal protective equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.