Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844971›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Medicinal plant species used for contraception and reproductive health care in rural Uganda.

Madina Mohamed Adia, Asiimwe Savina, Namukobe Jane, Mukwaya Joel, Anywar Godwin, Kakudidi K Esezah, Byamukama Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madina Mohamed AdiaDepartment of Chemistry, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Asiimwe SavinaDepartment of Plant Sciences, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Namukobe JaneDepartment of Chemistry, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Mukwaya JoelDepartment of Veterinary Pharmacology Clinical and Comparative Medicine, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Anywar GodwinDepartment of Plant Sciences, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Kakudidi K EsezahDepartment of Plant Sciences, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Byamukama RobertDepartment of Chemistry, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicinal plants form an integral part of traditional health care systems in Uganda and are known to possess a variety of bioactive compounds some of which are beneficial as contraceptives. This study documented indigenous traditional knowledge on medicinal plant species used in contraception and other reproductive health care-related issues in rural Uganda. An ethnobotanical study was conducted from December 2019 to August 2020 in four different regions of Uganda: Mpigi, Kamuli, Bushenyi and Arua. Data was obtained from 158 traditional medical practitioners using semi-structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data while quantitative analysis of data was done using the informant consensus factor (FIC), Percentage Use Value (PUV) and Jaccard Index (JI). The study recorded 98 medicinal plant species with the potential to manage family planning and other reproductive health related conditions. The most represented family was Asteraceae with 18 species. Plant remedies were mainly prepared as decoctions (41 %) and administered orally (36 %). Most plant species (61 %) were harvested from wild habitats. Herbs (50 %) and leaves (50 %) contributed the highest percentage of plant growth forms and parts used respectively. The FIC value of 0.6 demonstrated that the herbalists, traditional birth attendants and community elders tend to agree with each other regarding plant species used and administration. JI ranged from 13 % to 0.9 %, an indication of very low similarities between the plants used in family planning and traditional health care among the communities in the study areas. The most frequently cited plant species for family planning management were:

Indexed as

EthnobotanyFactor informant consensusFamily planningMedicinal plantsReproductive health care

Identifiers

PMID39844971
PMCPMC11750540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.