ReviewSurgery in practice and science2024
Advances and results in omental patch repair of gastrointestinal perforations: A narrative review.
Review in Surgery in practice and science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pedicled falciformopexy as an alternative surgical technique in peptic ulcer perforation: a case report and review of the literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- A robust asymmetric bioadhesive patch for sutureless intestinal repair to prevent anastomotic leakage and postoperative adhesion.Theranostics · 2026Article
- A case report of an unusual presentation of chyle leak after repair of a perforated gastric ulcer.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic wedge resection and omental patch in an elderly patient with acute abdomen: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Omental patch repair is a crucial surgical procedure for managing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly those associated with peptic ulcers, necessitating a detailed review of its effectiveness and outcomes. This literature review aims to assess current knowledge on omental patch repair, focusing on advancements in surgical techniques and patient outcomes. Major medical databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched for relevant studies published between 2020 and 2024, prioritizing those that explored omental patch repair, surgical methods, and associated clinical outcomes. The results provide insights into the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal perforations, the effectiveness of omental patch repair in promoting healing, and its role in reducing postoperative complications. Both open and laparoscopic techniques have demonstrated improved patient outcomes, including reduced mortality, morbidity, and faster recovery times. Additionally, alternative methods, such as the use of the falciform ligament, offer comparable efficacy in cases where the omentum is unavailable. This review underscores the importance of omental patch repair as a reliable surgical intervention adaptable to various clinical environments. However, further research is necessary to address gaps in long-term outcomes, particularly regarding recurrence rates and complications, highlighting the need for continued innovation and refinement of techniques to enhance patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.