ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Improving long-term postoperative survival in a porcine cardiac valve surgery model utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass via left thoracotomy: a single-center experience sharing insights.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large Animal Models for Preclinical Evaluation of Heart Valve Prostheses, Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to improve long-term postoperative survival in a porcine cardiac valve surgery model by utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) via left thoracotomy. The study aimed to share refined techniques and insights accumulated over years at a single-center animal clinical trial facility. Method: A total of 196 Chinese Large White pigs weighing between 60 and 75 kg were used in the study. All animals underwent cardiac valve surgeries via left thoracotomy with CPB. Surgical techniques included mitral valve replacement, mitral valve repair, aortic valve replacement, OZAKI procedure, ascending aorta replacement, and left ventricular assist device implantation. Anesthesia and CPB protocols were optimized to minimize stress and complications. Postoperative care was standardized to enhance recovery and survival. Result: All 196 pigs survived the surgical procedures, with no deaths reported. The mean surgical duration was 168.55 ± 38.75 min, CPB time was 114.89 ± 32.11 min, and aortic cross-clamp time was 76.75 ± 21.33 min. Automatic heart resumption occurred in 63.8% of pigs, while the remainder required electrical defibrillation or cardiac massage. The postoperative mechanical ventilation time was 2.44 ± 0.58 min, and the average drainage volume at 2 h postoperatively was 27.50 ± 9.70 ml. There were no cases of postoperative hemorrhage complications or blood transfusions, and surgical site infections occurred in only 1.5% of pigs. Conclusion: The surgical approach utilizing left thoracotomy with CPB has proven effective in significantly enhancing long-term survival rates in porcine heart surgeries. The refined techniques and standardized operational procedures described in this study offer valuable insights for researchers aiming to improve the success of porcine heart valve surgical models. However, due to differences in animal anatomy, the applicability of this surgical approach to other animal models still requires further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.