ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Evolving perspectives on aortic stenosis: the increasing importance of evaluating the right ventricle before aortic valve intervention.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- More than Fluid: AI-Derived Pleural Effusion Volume as a Marker of Cardiovascular Congestion in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Right heart function matters: prognostic value of sPAP, TAPSE and RV-PA coupling in a real-world cohort of TAVI patients.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Conventional preoperative parameters associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation after TAVR: a comparative single-center study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical Significance of TAPSE/PASP Ratio in Risk Stratification for Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Aortic Stenosis: Toward a Comprehensive Cardiometabolic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) was historically considered a disease of the left side of the heart, with the main pathophysiological impact being predominantly on the left ventricle (LV). However, progressive pressure overload in AS can initiate a cascade of extra-valvular myocardial remodeling that could also precipitate maladaptive alterations in the structure and function of the right ventricle (RV). The haemodynamic and clinical importance of these changes in patients with AS have been largely underappreciated in the past. Contemporary data indicates that RV dilatation or impairment identifies the AS patients who are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). It is now increasingly recognised that effective quantitative assessment of the RV plays a key role in delineating the late clinical stage of AS, which could improve patient risk stratification. Despite the increasing emphasis on the pathological significance of RV changes in AS, it remains to be established if earlier detection of these changes can improve the timing for intervention. This review will summarise the features of normal RV physiology and the mechanisms responsible for RV impairment in AS. In addition, we will discuss the multimodality approach to the comprehensive assessment of RV size, function and mechanics in AS patients. Finally, we will review the emerging evidence reinforcing the negative impact of RV dysfunction on clinical outcomes in AS patients treated with AVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.