ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Second primary non-myeloid malignancies following intensive treatment for adult acute myeloid leukaemia: a Danish population-based cohort study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Second primary malignancies (SPMs) are a well-known, long-term complication of antineoplastic treatment. This nationwide cohort study examined the risk of non-myeloid SPMs in survivors of adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy and, in some cases, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), compared to a matched general population. Methods: Patients with incident AML between 2000 and 2018, alive and aged 18-70 years two years after start of intensive chemotherapy, were included and matched 1:10 to comparators from the general Danish population on sex, age, and the Nordic Multimorbidity Index. Exclusion criteria were non-myeloid SPMs for both AML survivors and comparators. Findings: A total of 750 AML survivors and 7500 comparators were followed for a median of 10.6 years. The hazard ratio (HR) of non-myeloid SPMs was 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.89) for AML survivors compared to comparators, driven by non-melanoma skin cancer (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.90-3.35), not of solid cancer (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87-1.49). The 10-year cumulative incidences of any non-myeloid SPM were 13.5% (95% CI 10.6-16.5%) in AML survivors and 11.9% (95% CI 11.1-12.8%) in matched comparators. Additionally, AML survivors consolidated with alloSCT had a higher hazard rate of non-myeloid SPMs compared to non-transplanted AML survivors (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.00-2.26). Interpretation: The increased rate of non-myeloid SPMs observed in this population-based cohort study of AML survivors was almost entirely driven by non-melanoma skin cancer and is thus outweighed by the importance of intensive chemotherapy. Funding: Svend Andersen, Heinrich Kopps, and Karen Elise Jensen's Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.