ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Multi-center real-world data-driven web calculator for predicting outcomes in IDH-mutant gliomas: Integrating molecular subtypes and treatment modalities.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas generally have a better prognosis than IDH-wild-type glioblastomas, and the extent of resection significantly impacts prognosis. However, there is a lack of integrated tools for predicting outcomes based on molecular subtypes and treatment modalities. This study aimed to identify factors influencing gross total resection (GTR) rates and to develop a clinical prognostic tool for IDH-mutant gliomas. Methods: We analyzed 650 patients with IDH-mutant gliomas from 3 Chinese medical centers (Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Zhengzhou). Data included age, sex, extent of resection, radiotherapy status, tumor grade, histology, and molecular markers (1p19q, TERT promoter, BRAF, EGFR, 10q). Patients were categorized based on GTR status, and a nomogram predicting 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression and validated with time-dependent ROC and calibration plot analyses. Results: Non-GTR was associated with diffuse astrocytoma (73.0% vs. 53.5%), 1p19q non-codeletion (67.9% vs. 48.7%), and wildtype TERT promoter (63.6% vs. 52.4%). The nomogram, incorporating age, TERT promoter status, extent of resection, grade, and radiotherapy status, demonstrated strong discriminatory ability (AUC > 0.75) and good calibration. Decision curve analysis indicated that it outperformed WHO grade-based classification in identifying high-risk patients. An online calculator was developed for clinical use (http://www.szflab.site/nomogram/). Conclusion: We developed and validated a nomogram and online tool that integrates molecular and clinical factors for predicting outcomes in IDH-mutant gliomas, enhancing clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.