Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844816›Full record

ReviewSurgery in practice and science2023

Impact of work hour restrictions on the operative experience of general surgical residents: A systematic review.

Hamza Ashraf, Deepika Gunda, F Hamish Morgan, Gizem Ashraf, Alexander R Cortez, Vijayaragavan Muralidharan, Sean Stevens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Changes in operative and in-hospital outcome of proximal femoral fractures before and after the implementation of work hour restrictions in Switzerland.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hamza AshrafDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Deepika GundaDepartment of Surgery, Albury-Wodonga Health, New South Wales, Australia.
F Hamish MorganDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Gizem AshrafCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Alexander R CortezDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States.
Vijayaragavan MuralidharanDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Sean StevensDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Work hour restrictions (WHR) have been implemented globally to improve resident safety and welfare, but many in the surgical community have raised concerns regarding the impact on resident education and operative experience. This systematic review aims to investigate the impact of WHR on general surgical resident operative caseload. Materials and methods: Medline and Embase databases were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines to identify articles published between 2003 and 2022 assessing the impact of WHR on the operative experience of general surgical residents. Articles were only included if they reported on quantitative measures of operative experience and examined operative caseload after the introduction of WHR. Results: Of 1,266 studies identified, 26 studies were included, with the majority from US literature. Total major cases underwent a 0.6 % decrease after the introduction of WHR, with surgeon chief cases undergoing a 3.3 % decrease and surgeon junior cases undergoing a 3.7 % increase. Operative trauma underwent the greatest decrease at 18.4 %. Skin & soft tissue cases underwent the greatest increase at 67.6 %. Discussion: While WHR were often associated with reduced operative caseload in the early years following implementation, the majority of studies found a significant reduction was avoided in the long-term as training programs likely adapted to the new environment. These findings are of particular significance to countries considering the introduction of WHR for surgical residents and may guide future policy and decision-making. Conclusions: This review demonstrated no significant change in total major cases and an increased caseload for most operative subcategories after the introduction of WHR for general surgical residents. These findings are in keeping with a previous review published in 2011.

Indexed as

General surgeryOperative experiencePostgraduate surgical trainingResident duty hoursSurgical trainingWork hour restrictions

Identifiers

PMID39844816
PMCPMC11750031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.