ReviewSurgery in practice and science2023
Beveled vs. Perpendicular Incisions and The Effects on Wound Healing: A Review.
Review in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beveled vs. perpendicular skin incisions on the back: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper surgical technique is crucial for optimizing wound healing and reducing scar tissue formation. There are numerous measures a surgeon can take to improve wound healing; however, the angle of the incision made at the surgical site has been suggested to potentially play a role in wound healing, particularly between beveled and perpendicular incisions. Objectives: The goal of this study was to analyze the literature and observe whether a discrepancy exists between using beveled vs perpendicular incisions in surgical procedures, as well as to understand the relationship between incision angles and physiologic wound healing. Methods: Google Scholar, Pubmed, and MEDLINE searches regarding incision techniques were made to find relevant articles in the fields of plastic surgery, dermatologic surgery, periodontal surgery, and ophthalmic surgery which included studies from 2004 to 2023. The exclusion criteria consisted of studies that did not have a comparative design and/or were not revolved around incision angle. Results: After filtering out irrelevant studies, we selected six studies that addressed the dichotomy between beveled and perpendicular incisions. Out of the six studies, four were in favor of beveled incisions, and the remaining studies either found no significant difference or reported benefits to some degree of using perpendicular cuts. Discussion: The literature seems to suggest that beveled incisions have an advantage over perpendicular incisions in wound healing, particularly in the aspects of esthetic and accelerated wound healing. This is potentially due to the increased surface area of the dermis, preservation of hair follicles, and decreased incidence of infection. Conclusion: Although the literature seems to favor beveled incisions, a definitive conclusion cannot be made as there is not sufficient evidence to support the superiority of one incision type over the other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.