ArticleSurgery in practice and science2023
Outcomes of trauma patients on chronic antithrombotic therapies in a trauma center in a rural state.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The number of trauma patients presenting with chronic antithrombotic therapy is on the rise. The risk of hemorrhage, the leading cause of death in trauma patients, increases for those on such therapy. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients on warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), or antiplatelet agents. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center with pre-admission antithrombotic therapy. Patients were divided into those on warfarin, DOACs, and antiplatelet agents. The primary outcomes measured were hospital mortality, total blood products received, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS. Results: 738 patients were included in the study: 191 (26 %) warfarin, 260 (35 %) DOACs, and 287 (39 %) antiplatelet. There were no differences in the demographic variables between study groups. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was similar across the three groups as well as blood product usage, reversal agent usage, and mean hospital stay. Multivariable regression showed patients with pre-admission antiplatelet usage were more likely to have a shorter ICU LOS than those on warfarin ( Conclusion: Blood product and reversal agent use was similar between patients on warfarin, DOACs, or antiplatelet agents. Patients on antiplatelet agents had a shorter ICU stay than the warfarin group, the only significant difference observed. Our results indicate similar safety profiles of antithrombotic medications in a generic trauma population, likely due to institutional protocols to increase responsiveness and immediate availability of resources when the patient has known anticoagulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.