Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844801›Full record

ArticleSurgery in practice and science2023

Radiation-induced recto-urinary fistula: A dreaded complication with devastating consequences.

Kyeong Ri Yu, Lucas Keller-Biehl, Leon Smith-Harrison, Sarah Z Hazell, William R Timmerman, Jeannie F Rivers, Thomas A Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyeong Ri YuDepartment of Surgery, Richmond VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA 23249, United States.
Lucas Keller-BiehlDepartment of Surgery, Richmond VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA 23249, United States.
Leon Smith-HarrisonEastern Virginia Medical School, Family Medicine Residency, 825 Fairfax Avenue, Norfolk, VA 23507; Former Research Fellow, Department of Surgery, Richmond VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, Virginia 23249, United States.
Sarah Z HazellDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Richmond VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, Virginia 23249, United States.
William R TimmermanDepartment of Surgery, Richmond VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA 23249, United States.
Jeannie F RiversDepartment of Surgery, Richmond VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA 23249, United States.
Thomas A MillerDepartment of Surgery, Richmond VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA 23249, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate our 16-year experience with fistulas between the rectum and urethra or urinary bladder, collectively called recto-urinary fistulas (RUFs), and their devastating consequences in patients treated with radiation for prostate cancer. Methods: We downloaded the records of all patients with radiation-related RUFS from 2004 to 2020 at our institution using the electronic medical record system. Details concerning patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches and surgical management were obtained and assessed. Results: We identified a total of seven patients with radiation-induced RUFS: all were male and had an average age of 66 at diagnosis. Each had a history of prostate cancer that was treated with external, internal (i.e.brachytherapy), or combination radiation therapy. No fistulas were noted in patients treated with radiation for another malignancy. Radiation proctitis with rectal ulcer formation occurred in 6 of 7 patients. Common symptoms included fecaluria, pneumaturia, urine leakage via rectum, rectal pain and urinary tract infection. CT scanning was the most useful diagnostic tool. Once confirmed, fistula management included both urinary and fecal diversion in all patients. Only one patient received definitive repair of the fistula. Five others either died before repair could be attempted or had prohibitive co-morbid diseases. One patient declined repair. Conclusions: Although rare, the development of a recto-urinary fistula is a dreaded complication. Our results indicate that radiation proctitis with rectal ulcer formation precedes fistula formation in most patients and must be aggressively managed. While fecal and urinary diversion can manage fistula symptoms in the majority of patients, definitive fistula repair is only possible in selected individuals.

Indexed as

FistulaProstate cancerRadiation proctitisRectumUrinary tract

Identifiers

PMID39844801
PMCPMC11750036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.