ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
The economic burden of smoking in Belgium: incremental healthcare costs and lost productivity.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic Burden of Self-Reported Tobacco Smoking Compared with Non-Smoking: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Health Care Costs.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of smoking on the treatment cycle and health economics of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tobacco use is among the leading behavioural risk factors for morbidity and mortality. These high rates result in a high cost to society. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to provide a contemporary overview of the direct medical and indirect costs attributable to smoking tobacco in Belgium. Data from the Belgian Health Interview Survey (BHIS) was combined with health insurance claims data. Healthcare costs were calculated on individuals' cigarette smoking patterns (daily, former, and never smokers). Lost productivity costs were calculated by multiplying the number of absence days by the national average wage cost per day. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses with negative binomial distribution and log link were performed to evaluate the average healthcare costs and indirect costs in relation to tobacco use, socio-demographic characteristics, and (behavioural) risk factors. A total of 10 829 individuals were included in the analyses, of which 47.7% were men, with 15% being smokers. Men were more likely to be smokers than women (56.8% vs. 43.2%; P < 0.001). Compared to never smokers, significantly higher direct medical costs were found for daily (20%; P = 0.03) and former smokers (27%; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for the indirect costs for the smoking population compared to never smokers. Taking into account that 15% of the Belgian population were daily smokers in 2018, the national cost for daily smokers equates to €533.861.010. Results of our study show that cigarette smoking has higher direct medical costs compared with never smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.