Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844505›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine communications2025

Patients, parents and professional perspectives on molecular radiotherapy for neuroblastoma and paediatric neuroendocrine cancers.

Lisa Whittaker, Leona Knox, Zara Aitchison, Connie Peet, Aine O'Donovan, Juliet Gray, Simon Wan, Glenn D Flux, Mark N Gaze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular radiotherapy for adult type metastatic neuroendocrine tumours in children.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Observational
  2. Theranostics for Neuroblastoma: Making Molecular Radiotherapy Work Better.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa WhittakerCentre for Medical Engineering, King's College London, .
Leona KnoxSolving Kids' Cancer, .
Zara AitchisonNeuroblastoma UK,  .
Connie PeetDepartment of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, .
Aine O'DonovanDepartment of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, .
Juliet GrayDepartment of Paediatric Oncology, University Hospital Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, .
Simon WanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University College, London Hospitals NHS, Foundation Trust.
Glenn D FluxJoint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, and.
Mark N GazeDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8344-7902

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment with radioactive drugs (molecular radiotherapy, MRT) is an option for selected children with neuroblastoma and neuroendocrine cancers. As few hospitals are appropriately equipped and staffed to provide paediatric MRT, many families have to travel long distances from home for prolonged periods. To improve professional understanding of the challenges faced by children receiving these treatments and their parents, and to help them appreciate the difficulties faced by professionals in delivering complex treatments, a meeting bringing together parents, patients and professionals was held. Ten people (five parents of children with neuroblastoma, two parents of children with neuroendocrine cancers, two adults who had received treatment for neuroendocrine cancers in childhood and one adult treated for neuroblastoma) gave personal perspectives of treatment with MRT. Three professionals from different disciplines involved with this treatment and research to improve its results gave their views on the administration of MRT, and how treatment outcomes might be improved. Fifteen people, including parents and professionals, contributed to the general discussion. Following the meeting, a questionnaire was circulated to those attending to capture their overall views, and any reflections they may have had after the meeting. Whilst many positive comments and compliments were received, this report focuses on the reported challenges and difficulties. The event is an example of meaningful Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement and has resulted in development of better information resources, strategies to mitigate inconveniences experienced and a standing group of advocates to advise on research design and acceptability.

Indexed as

NeuroblastomaNeuroendocrine TumorsParentsPatientsAdultChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID39844505
PMCPMC11878586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.