Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844477›Full record

ReviewYeast (Chichester, England)2024

CAYSS: Package for Automatic Cytometry Analysis of Yeast Spore Segregation.

Xavier Raffoux, Matthieu Falque

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xavier RaffouxINRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-0904
Matthieu FalqueINRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

GQE-Le Moulon benefits from the support of the LabEx Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS (ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS). The present work has also benefited from funding from the EVOLREC (ANR-20-CE13-0010) and CO-PATT (ANR-20-CE12-0006) projects.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination is a powerful source of haplotypic diversity, and thus plays an important role in the dynamics of short-term adaptation. However, high-throughput quantitative measurement of recombination parameters is challenging because of the large size of offspring to be genotyped. One of the most efficient approaches for large-scale recombination measurement is to study the segregation of fluorescent markers in gametes. Applying this to yeast spores by flow cytometry has already been proved to be highly efficient, but manual analyses of distributions of signal intensities is time-consuming and produces nonperfectly reproducible results. Such analyses are required to identify events corresponding to spores and to assign each of them to a genotypic class depending on their fluorescence intensity. The CAYSS package automatically reproduces the manual process that we've been developing to analyze yeast recombination for years, including Maximum-Likelihood estimation of fluorescence extinction (Raffoux et al. 2018a). When comparing the results of manual versus CAYSS automatic analyses of the same cytometry data, recombination rates and interference were on average very similar, with less than 3% differences on average and strong correlations (R

Indexed as

Flow CytometrySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSoftwareSpores, FungalMeiosisRecombination, Geneticbudding yeastcrossover interferenceFACSflow cytometrymeiotic recombination rate

Identifiers

PMID39844477
PMCPMC11826985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.