Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844423›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Radio-tracking urban breeding birds: The importance of native vegetation.

Gábor Seress, Krisztina Sándor, Veronika Bókony, Boglárka Bukor, Katalin Hubai, András Liker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Radio-tracking urban breeding birds: The importance of native vegetation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gábor SeressBehavioral Ecology Research Group, Center for Natural Sciences, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9828-4934
Krisztina SándorHUN-REN-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Veronika BókonyDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Boglárka BukorBehavioral Ecology Research Group, Center for Natural Sciences, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.
Katalin HubaiResearch Group of Ecotoxicology, Center for Natural Sciences, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.
András LikerBehavioral Ecology Research Group, Center for Natural Sciences, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.

Funding

HUN-REN TKI Hungarian Research NetworkJános Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesNational Research, Development and Innovation Office FK-137743Sustainable Development and Technologies National Programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (FFT NP FTA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As urban areas continue to expand globally, a deeper understanding of the functioning of urban green spaces is crucial for maintaining habitats that effectively support wildlife within our cities. Cities typically harbor a wide variety of nonnative vegetation, providing limited support for insect populations. The resulting scarcity of arthropods has been increasingly linked to adverse effects at higher trophic levels, such as the reduced reproductive success of insectivorous birds in urban environments. However, the responses by which urban breeding birds cope with the challenges of food limitation remain largely unexplored. To address this knowledge gap, in a Central European city, we employed radiotelemetry tracking and real-time observations on urban-breeding female great tits' habitat use, combined with detailed plant surveys and video recordings of nestlings' diet. This integrated approach enabled us to establish direct links between great tits' foraging behavior, vegetation preferences, and nestling diet. We found that besides tree canopies, great tits also frequently foraged on the ground and that the availability of bird feeders notably affected birds' habitat use. Foraging great tits generally avoided nonnative plants, particularly broadleaved species. When searching for nestling food, great tits were most time-efficient on conifers, albeit these trees provided low amounts of caterpillars (a preferred prey type). Great tits were more likely to forage on and deliver nestling food from large native trees and foraged less on and collected fewer prey items from the most abundant tree species. Our results underscore the importance of several factors that may help improve habitat quality for urban insectivorous birds, with preserving large trees and increasing diverse native vegetation being key elements in this endeavor.

Indexed as

EcosystemPasseriformesPlantsAnimalsCitiesFeeding BehaviorFemaleNesting BehaviorTelemetryanthropogenic foodarthropodsbird feederforaging behaviorhabitat preferencenative plantsnestling foodParus majorurban birdsurban vegetation

Identifiers

PMID39844423
PMCPMC11754724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.