Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844405›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2025

Surgical Advancements, Immunotherapy, Targeted and Conventional Therapies, Biopsy, Colposcopy, and Pap Smear Integration in the Management of Cervical Cancer.

Siddhi Wargantiwar, Sankha Bhattacharya, Abhishek Kanugo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. iScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siddhi WargantiwarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM'S NMIMS Deemed-to-be University, Shirpur, Maharashtra, 425405, India.
Sankha BhattacharyaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM'S NMIMS Deemed-to-be University, Shirpur, Maharashtra, 425405, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0771-9582
Abhishek KanugoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, SVKM Institute of Pharmacy, Dhule, 424001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5205-5906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern, making it essential to investigate new treatment options continuously. This page provides an overview of the latest advancements and best practices in detection and intervention, including Pap smears, colposcopy, biopsy, immunotherapy, targeted therapies, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Surgical techniques such as radical hysterectomy and minimally invasive procedures have advanced to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life. Simultaneously, radiation therapy methods have been refined to maximize tumour control while reducing adverse effects. Chemotherapy remains vital, with new drugs and combination regimens demonstrating improved tolerance and efficacy. Immunotherapy, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors, has shown promise in advanced stages of cervical cancer. Additionally, targeted therapies that focus on specific biochemical pathways offer the potential for personalized treatment approaches. This review critically assesses ongoing research, evaluates existing data, and emphasizes the opportunities and challenges of each therapeutic approach. Ultimately, integrating these diverse treatment strategies is the key to enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiopsyColposcopyFemaleHumansPapanicolaou TestCervical cancerchemotherapycolposcopyimmunotherapypap smear testtargeted therapy.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.