ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2025
Modulation of
Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Challenges We Faced with Animal Models for Neurological Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCatamenial epilepsy, which is defined as a periodicity of seizure exacerbation occurring during the menstrual cycle, has been reported in up to 70% of epileptic women. These seizures are often non-responsive to medication and our understanding of the relation between menstrual cycle and seizure generation (i.e. ictogenesis) remains limited.
methodsHere, we employed the
resultsWe found that: (i) optogenetic stimulation of PV-positive interneurons induced an initial interictal spike followed by field oscillations occurring more often in estrous (59%) than in non-estrous slices (17%); (ii) these oscillations showed significantly higher power in estrous compared to nonestrous slices (p < 0.001); (iii) significantly higher rates of interictal spikes and ictal discharges were identified in both estrous and non-estrous slices during optogenetic stimulation of PV-positive interneurons compared to periods of no stimulation (p < 0.05); and (iv) ictal events appeared to occur more frequently during optogenetic stimulation in estrous compared to non-estrous slices.
conclusionOur findings show that optogenetic activation of PV-interneurons leads to more powerful network oscillations and more frequent ictal discharges in estrous than in non-estrous slices. We conclude that during the rodent estrous cycle, PV-interneuron hyperexcitability may play a role in epileptiform synchronization and thus in catamenial seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.