Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844353›Full record

Trial reportKorean journal of anesthesiology2025

Effect of remimazolam on intraoperative hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Chang-Hoon Koo, Si Un Lee, Hyeong-Geun Kim, Soowon Lee, Yu Kyung Bae, Ah-Young Oh, Young-Tae Jeon, Jung-Hee Ryu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Remimazolam - expectations and concerns.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Safety of Remimazolam in Vulnerable Populations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chang-Hoon KooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Si Un LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hyeong-Geun KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Soowon LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Yu Kyung BaeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Ah-Young OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Young-Tae JeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Jung-Hee RyuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital 02-2022-0021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery.

methodsSixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil.

resultsOccurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group.

conclusionsRemimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesHemodynamicsAgedAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypotensionMaleMiddle AgedPropofolProspective StudiesAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousBenzodiazepinesPropofolremimazolamAnesthesiaBlood pressureCerebral ischemiaHemodynamicsHypnotics and sedativesMoyamoya disease.

Identifiers

PMID39844353
PMCPMC12013992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.