Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844346›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025

Delayed feeding disrupts diurnal oscillations in the gut microbiome of a neotropical bat in captivity.

Dominik W Melville, Magdalena Meyer, Corbinian Kümmerle, Kevin A Alvarado-Barrantes, Kerstin Wilhelm, Simone Sommer, Marco Tschapka, Alice Risely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The hallmarks of host-microbiome decoupling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Bacterial Composition Across Bat Species: A Human Health Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominik W MelvilleInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8908-3882
Magdalena MeyerInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-3850
Corbinian KümmerleInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Kevin A Alvarado-BarrantesEscuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San Jose, Costa Rica.
Kerstin WilhelmInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5583-2777
Simone SommerInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-1699-4789
Marco TschapkaInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9511-6775
Alice RiselySchool of Science, Engineering and Environment, Salford University, M5 4WT Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0731-2934

Funding

German Research Foundation DFG SO 428/17-1Ulm University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diurnal rhythms of the gut microbiota are emerging as an important yet often overlooked facet of microbial ecology. Feeding is thought to stimulate gut microbial rhythmicity, but this has not been explicitly tested. Moreover, the role of the gut environment is entirely unexplored, with rhythmic changes to gut pH rather than feeding per se possibly affecting gut microbial fluctuations. In this study, we experimentally manipulated the feeding schedule of captive lesser long-nosed bats, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae, to dissociate photic and feeding cues, and measured the faecal microbiota and gut pH every 2 h. We detected strong diurnal rhythms in both microbial alpha diversity and beta diversity as well as in pH within the control group. However, a delay in feeding disrupted oscillations of gut microbial diversity and composition, but did not affect rhythms in gut pH. The oscillations of some genera, such as Streptococcus, which aid in metabolizing nutrients, shifted in accordance with the delayed-feeding cue and were correlated with pH. For other bacterial genera, oscillations were disturbed and no connection to pH was found. Our findings suggest that the rhythmic proliferation of bacteria matches peak feeding times, providing evidence that diurnal rhythms of the gut microbiota likely evolved to optimize their metabolic support to the host's circadian phenotype.

Indexed as

ChiropteraCircadian RhythmFeeding BehaviorGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaFecesHydrogen-Ion Concentrationcircadian rhythmdiet experimentdysbiosisgut pHLeptonycteris yerbabuenaemicrobial ecology

Identifiers

PMID39844346
PMCPMC11783575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.