Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844304›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025

Stochastic demethylation and redundant epigenetic suppressive mechanisms generate highly heterogeneous responses to pharmacological DNA methyltransferase inhibition.

Mie K Jakobsen, Sofie Traynor, Aaraby Y Nielsen, Christina Dahl, Mette Staehr, Simon T Jakobsen, Maria S Madsen, Rasmus Siersbaek, Mikkel G Terp, Josefine B Jensen and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Mie K Jakobsen *Department of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Sofie Traynor *Department of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Aaraby Y NielsenDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Christina DahlDanish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette StaehrDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Simon T JakobsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Maria S MadsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Rasmus SiersbaekDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mikkel G TerpDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Josefine B JensenDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Christina B PedersenDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anup ShresthaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jonathan R BrewerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Pascal H G DuijfCentre for Cancer Biology, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia & SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Odd L GammelgaardDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik J DitzelDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Alexei F KirkinCytovac A/S, Hørsholm, 2970, Denmark.
Per GuldbergDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Morten F GjerstorffDepartment of Cancer Research, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. mgjerstorff@health.sdu.dk.

Funding

Kræftens Bekæmpelse R1R204-A12255Kræftens Bekæmpelse R302-A17469Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF18OC0052303Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF18SA0032928Villum Fonden 42066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite promising preclinical studies, the application of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in treating patients with solid cancers has thus far produced only modest outcomes. The presence of intratumoral heterogeneity in response to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors could significantly influence clinical efficacy, yet our understanding of the single-cell response to these drugs in solid tumors remains very limited.

methodsIn this study, we used cancer/testis antigen genes as a model for methylation-dependent gene expression to examine the activity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and their potential synergistic effect with histone deacetylase inhibitors at the single-cancer cell level. The analysis was performed on breast cancer patient-derived xenograft tumors and cell lines, employing a comprehensive set of techniques, including targeted single-cell mRNA sequencing. Mechanistic insights were further gained through DNA methylation profiling and chromatin structure analysis.

resultsWe show that breast cancer tumors and cell cultures exhibit a highly heterogenous response to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, persisting even under high drug concentrations and efficient DNA methyltransferase depletion. The observed variability in response to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors was independent of cancer-associated aberrations and clonal genetic diversity. Instead, these variations were attributed to stochastic demethylation of regulatory CpG sites and the DNA methylation-independent suppressive function of histone deacetylases.

conclusionsOur findings point to intratumoral heterogeneity as a limiting factor in the use of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors as single agents in treatment of solid cancers and highlight histone deacetylase inhibitors as essential partners to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in the clinic.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesEnzyme InhibitorsEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansMiceXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysDNA Modification MethylasesEnzyme InhibitorsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsCancer/testis antigen.DNA methylationDNA methyltransferase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39844304
PMCPMC11755921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.