ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025
Stochastic demethylation and redundant epigenetic suppressive mechanisms generate highly heterogeneous responses to pharmacological DNA methyltransferase inhibition.
Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies: DNA methylation in pancreatic cancer.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Epigenetic modifications in cancer drug resistance: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Hypoxic microenvironment and pulmonary hypertension.Respiratory research · 2025Review
- Study on Abnormal Angiogenesis in Moyamoya Disease via Mitochondrial D-Loop Methylation.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Article
- Nanotechnology-driven Epigenetic Cancer Therapy: Precision Delivery and Sustained Release of DNA Methylation Modulators.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite promising preclinical studies, the application of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in treating patients with solid cancers has thus far produced only modest outcomes. The presence of intratumoral heterogeneity in response to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors could significantly influence clinical efficacy, yet our understanding of the single-cell response to these drugs in solid tumors remains very limited.
methodsIn this study, we used cancer/testis antigen genes as a model for methylation-dependent gene expression to examine the activity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and their potential synergistic effect with histone deacetylase inhibitors at the single-cancer cell level. The analysis was performed on breast cancer patient-derived xenograft tumors and cell lines, employing a comprehensive set of techniques, including targeted single-cell mRNA sequencing. Mechanistic insights were further gained through DNA methylation profiling and chromatin structure analysis.
resultsWe show that breast cancer tumors and cell cultures exhibit a highly heterogenous response to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, persisting even under high drug concentrations and efficient DNA methyltransferase depletion. The observed variability in response to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors was independent of cancer-associated aberrations and clonal genetic diversity. Instead, these variations were attributed to stochastic demethylation of regulatory CpG sites and the DNA methylation-independent suppressive function of histone deacetylases.
conclusionsOur findings point to intratumoral heterogeneity as a limiting factor in the use of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors as single agents in treatment of solid cancers and highlight histone deacetylase inhibitors as essential partners to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.