ArticleTrials2025
Impact of early versus late artificial rupture of membranes during oxytocin induction of labour on the incidence of chorioamnionitis: a randomised controlled trial (ARM trial).
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe approach to induction of labour differs internationally, with timing of amniotomy being controversial. Some institutions favour performing artificial rupture of membranes prior to commencement of oxytocin infusion, with the belief that the labour will progress more efficiently. In other institutions, the approach recommended is for oxytocin infusion with intact amniotic membranes until the person has reached the active phase of labour, citing risk of infection with early amniotomy. Current evidence is inconclusive. We are performing a randomised controlled trial assessing whether delaying amniotomy until the active phase of labour can decrease the rate of chorioamnionitis.
methodsThis is a randomised controlled trial at a single centre in New Zealand. Pregnant people undergoing induction of labour at ≥ 37 weeks gestational age with intact membranes and a singleton gestation are eligible for the trial. Participants are randomised to 'Early' amniotomy, at the commencement of oxytocin infusion, or to 'Late' amniotomy, when they have reached a cervical dilation of 6 or more centimetres or when they have been receiving oxytocin infusion for 12 h. The primary outcome of the trial is chorioamnionitis. To detect a decrease in chorioamnionitis from 9 to 3% with a power of 80% and a 95% CI, we will require 488 participants in total, randomised in a 1:1 ratio. DISCUSSION: If delaying amniotomy reduces the rate of chorioamnionitis, this is important to inform future practice. Chorioamnionitis entails risk to both the pregnant person and the fetus and is an important contributor to neonatal sepsis, neonatal intensive care unit admission, maternal sepsis, caesarean, wound infection and postoperative infective complications. Conversely, if the rate of chorioamnionitis is not affected by timing of amniotomy, this will allow for safe individualization of care.
trial registrationThe trial is registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, anzctr.org.au. Full registry title is 'Impact of early versus late artificial rupture of membranes during oxytocin induction of labour on the incidence of chorioamnionitis: A randomised controlled trial'. TRIAL ID: ACTRN12621000405819. Date registered 14 April 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.