ArticleBMC public health2025
Perceptions of cervical screening uptake amongst South Asian women in Ontario, Canada: a concept mapping study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegular cervical screening can significantly reduce the onset and prevalence of cervical cancer. In Ontario, Canada, South Asian women have the lowest rates of cervical cancer screening among major ethnic groups in the province.
methodsUsing an innovative and participant-driven method called Concept Mapping (CM), we set out to understand how the lives and experiences of South Asian women living in Ontario shape their decisions around getting screened for cervical cancer. We engaged over 70 South Asian women and people who serve them in healthcare and community, to drive the CM process.
resultsParticipants brainstormed 45 unique and distinct statements. Through sorting and map interpretation, participants identified and interpreted 6 clusters amongst the statements: (1) Personal beliefs and misconceptions around cervical cancer; (2) Education and knowledge issues around cervical cancer; (3) Cultural beliefs and influences specific to sexual health; (4) Barriers to prioritizing uptake of cervical screening; (5) System/ infrastructure gaps or inadequacies; and (6) Lack of comfort and supportive relationships in healthcare. Additional analysis shows us the interrelationships between the ideas. Statements within the clusters about education and knowledge issues around cervical cancer, personal beliefs and misconceptions, as well as cultural beliefs and influences specific to sexual health are viewed as distinct beliefs with clear effects on the uptake of cervical screening. More complex interrelationships are seen with the cluster of statements about barriers to prioritizing uptake of cervical screening.
conclusionsAs Ontario and many other jurisdictions around the world seek to strengthen cervical screening efforts in line with national and international goals to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040, it is critical to address underscreening. This CM study recognizes the value of engaging those most impacted by an issue, to identify and prioritize how and where to intervene to address low rates of cervical screening. To address underscreening we need to design multi-level interventions that address the identified ideas and the interrelationships among them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.