Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844144›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Medical student training with next-generation handheld ultrasound devices - hands on examination of fetal biometry in obstetrics.

Ruben Plöger, Julia Matschl, Adeline Walter, Ulrich Gembruch, Brigitte Strizek, Charlotte Behning, Agnes Wittek, Florian Recker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruben PlögerDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Julia MatschlDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Adeline WalterDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Ulrich GembruchDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Brigitte StrizekDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Charlotte BehningInstitute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Agnes WittekDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, 53127, Germany. florian.recker@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe technical development of ultrasound devices based on silicon chips has revolutionized ultrasound examinations, leading to the implementation of these portable handheld devices (PUD) in different medical fields. However, training on these devices is necessary to assure appropriate use and ensure valid results. While training programs for the use of conventional standard ultrasound devices (SUD) have been described, no training program for these handheld devices has been developed thus far.

methodsA training program for obstetric ultrasound examination was modified through the addition of an extra module focusing on the use of these PUDs. After the module the students had to attend an OSCE in which their skills of using the PUD and the SUD were tested and analyzed by applying the agreement rate, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Furthermore, the students' ultrasound results were compared with those of trained physicians by employing the one-sample Student's t-test. After the OSCE, the students answered a survey regarding their experience and their expected use of these devices.

resultAn agreement of one hundred percent was reached for basic parameters such as fetal position, placental position, fetal heartbeat and for the classification of the amniotic fluid. The ICC showed a good to moderate agreement between the results of fetal biometry achieved by SUD and PUD. The T-test results confirmed a high reliability between the physicians' results and the students' results, independent of the used device. The students remarked a good handling of the ultrasound devices and supported the use in their future specialties. DISCUSSION: The reliability between the examinations using the SUD and PUD were high but lower than the results observed for trained physicians. Therefore, the implementation of an additional module for portable ultrasound teaches the students to reliably examine basic obstetric parameters and provides a solid basis for further training and improvement of ultrasound skills in use of PUD.

Indexed as

BiometryObstetricsUltrasonography, PrenatalClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansPregnancyStudents, MedicalChip-basedFetal biometryGynecologyMedical trainingObstetricsOSCEPersonal-device-based-point-of-care-ultrasoundPiezo-basedPOCUSPoint-of-care-ultrasoundSemiconductors

Identifiers

PMID39844144
PMCPMC11752848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.