ArticleBMC nursing2025
Stress assessment instruments for hospitalized preterm newborns: scoping review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Methylation ofBiological research for nursing · 2026Article
- Physiological correlates of pain in preterm infants: evidence from a meta-analytic approach.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Epigenetic consequences of toxic stress in preterm infants and their mothers: protocol for the premature infants, moms, and the social determinants of health-an epigenetic investigation study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe highly technological environment existing in intensive care units, essential for the survival of the newborn, contributes with a potentially devastating and traumatic effect, especially in preterm newborns and in their future lives, due to the early and frequent exposure to multiple stressors. The preterm newborn must be observed in a systematic and structured way, before, during and after any intervention, aiming at the correct assessment and interpretation of his behaviour and signs of stress, and at the timely planning of interventions that minimize and prevent stress. The objective of this review is to identify and map the instruments for assessing stress in preterm newborns admitted to neonatal units in scientific evidence.
methodsA scoping review was carried out using the methodology presented by The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the PRISMA ScR model (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extended for Scoping Reviews) for structuring the collected information. The research was carried out in three distinct phases supported by the Medline, CINALH databases through the EBSCO, Scielo and PubMed platform. Two reviewers screened all citations, abstract data and full-text articles, independently.
resultsTen articles were selected, all primary studies. Seven different scales were identified in the studies. DISCUSSION: This review highlights the limited availability of instruments exclusively designed to assess neonatal stress in neonatology. While most tools, like the Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale and ALPS-Neo, focus on pain and stress together, the NISS and NSS provide valuable insights despite limitations in capturing individualized stress responses. Differentiating stress from pain is crucial for implementing targeted, neuroprotective interventions. Adapting neonatology environments and care practices to minimize stressors is essential for promoting newborns' well-being and long-term development.
conclusionThe findings underscore the critical need for stress-specific assessment tools in NICUs to differentiate between pain and stress. Existing instruments offer valuable insights but have notable limitations. Expanding validated tools and prioritizing individualized, neuroprotective care are essential for improving outcomes. Adapting neonatology practices to reduce stressors and implement family-centered care will support the holistic needs of newborns, fostering their development, physiological stability, and overall well-being. SYSTEM REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/nsu95/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.