ArticleBMC nursing2025
Nursing staff and supervisors perceptions on stress and resilience: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distress, Risk Factors, and Adaptive Strategies of Middle Nurse Managers in Italy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Meta-integration of qualitative research on the clinical work experiences of emergency department nurses.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Change fatigue profiles of clinical nurses and their associations with perceived organizational support and self-efficacy: A latent profile analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Health status, health behavior and perceived stress of nursing staff in Germany: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Digital Health Technology Adoption Among Chinese Physicians: Latent Profile Analysis and Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- How Superiors Support Employees to Manage Emotional Demands: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Current status and influencing factors of job crafting ability in operating room senior nurses: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupervisor-subordinate relationship is high relevant in dealing with work-related stress and providing a compassionate, high-quality, and safe nursing care while meeting the needs of the hospital. Our aim was to assess the predisposing risk and resilience factors of the stress of nursing staff as well as to explore the common and distinctive perceptions of these factors between nurses without a managerial position (nursing staff) and employees in a supervising position (nurse managers, ward nurses).
designGeneric qualitative study using half-standardized interviews.
methodsFifty nurses and supervisors from different departments from a German hospital of maximum medical care participated in this study between August and November 2018. Nineteen face-to-face interviews and five focus groups were conducted. Transcripts were subjected to structured qualitative content analysis.
resultsSystematised in Lazarus's transactional model, nurses, and supervisors mentioned similar risk and resilience factors of stress. Disagreement in suggested responsibility for nurses' stress or health and an evaluation of implemented measures meeting the nurses' needs are discussed.
conclusionNursing staff and supervisors should enforce exchange to reduce disagreements in perceptions and to improve mutual understanding. Furthermore, measures to meet nurses' needs to minimize stress and to improve collaboration and job satisfaction should be developed in close coordination with the target group. The focus should be placed on restructuring training and education programs with supplementation of self-responsibility promotion. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS 00013482) on 09 March 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.