Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844113›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Profiles of innovative behavior and associated predictors among clinical nurses: a multicenter study using latent profile analysis.

Husheng Li, Yue Qiao, Tianxiang Wan, Chun Hua Shao, Fule Wen, Xiaoxin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Husheng Li *Department of Nursing, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 241, West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-0838
Yue Qiao *Department of Nursing, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 241, West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5209-4567
Tianxiang WanDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Chun Hua ShaoDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, UK.
Fule WenSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 227, South Chongqing Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China. wenfule@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-647X
Xiaoxin LiuDepartment of Nursing, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 241, West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China. lxx1018@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6380-264X

Funding

Shanghai Chest Hospital: Human Resource Development Program RC-202406-013Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine: Nursing Development Program SJTUHLXK2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovative Behavior (IB) is a key prerequisite for nurses in solving clinical problems. However, existing research on IB among clinical nurses is relatively limited.

objectiveTo identify profiles and characteristics of IB among clinical nurses and explore the associated predictors, as well as the relationships with research outputs.

methodsA multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on 354 clinical nurses in Shanghai from April 2023 to May 2023 (response rate 98.06%). IB was measured by the Innovative Behavior Scale for Nurses (IBSN), future time perspective was measured by the Future Time Perspective Scale (FTPS), and work engagement was measured by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (UWES-9). Socio-demographic and professional data and research output indicators were measured by a self-designed questionnaire. We used latent profile analysis (LPA) by Mplus 7.0 to identify latent classes of IB. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the relevant predictors on the different profiles. And then Pearson's chi-squared was used to analyze the association between IB level and research output.

resultsAmong the respondents, individuals aged 25 to 35 accounted for 55.9%, and females comprised 94.6%. IB of clinical nurses can be identified into 3 groups: low-level (n = 108, 30.51%), moderate-level (n = 149, 42.09%), and high-level (n = 97, 27.40%) groups. Based on the results of LPA, marital status, education level, work experience, monthly income, night shifts, future time perspective scores, and work engagement scores can be the predictors of IB among different profiles. Statistically significant associations were found between IB level and research productivity, including publishing academic papers (χ

conclusionAccording to our research, clinical nurses have three unique IB profiles. The current level is predominantly at a moderate level, with less than 30% demonstrating a high level of innovation. It revealed that better socio-demographic status and professional characteristics, future time perspective, and work engagement positively influenced innovative behavior among clinical nurses. The findings also highlight the potentially important role of IB in contributing to nurses' research output. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: As far as we know, it might be the first study to employ LPA to clarify the heterogeneity in the levels of IB and their specific distribution among nurses. Our findings may provide a new viewpoint for promoting IB among clinical nurses. Nursing administrators should pay attention to IB of clinical nurses and develop targeted interventions to enhance their IB levels.

Indexed as

Clinical nursesFuture time perspectiveInnovative behaviorLatent profile analysisLogistic regression analysisNursing managementWork engagement

Identifiers

PMID39844113
PMCPMC11756079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.