ArticleBMC nursing2025
Profiles of innovative behavior and associated predictors among clinical nurses: a multicenter study using latent profile analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative behavior among clinical nurses: empirical level stratification and associated factors in a cross-sectional study in Zhejiang Province, China.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The Level and Associated Factors of Creative Deviance of Clinical Nurses.Nursing open · 2026Observational
- Innovation capability characteristics among nursing undergraduates: a latent profile analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- The mediating role of innovative self-efficacy between transformational leadership and innovation performance among nurses in tertiary hospitals in China.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of professional identity and sleep quality and associations with anxiety symptoms among emergency nurses.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of innovative behavior among hemodialysis nurses and their association with artificial intelligence literacy: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Job Crafting Profiles Among Chinese Generation Z New Nurses: The Role of Innovative Behavior and Management Implications.Journal of nursing management · 2026Observational
- The moderating role of knowledge sharing behavior between innovative behavior and nursing competency: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Current status of innovative behaviors among nurses in public hospitals and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The impact of ambidextrous leadership on innovative work behavior among critical care nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of factors influencing innovative behaviors of intensive care unit nurses using a random forest model-a multicentre cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Unlocking innovation and resilience among emergency nurses through cultural intelligence: insights from a structural equation model.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInnovative Behavior (IB) is a key prerequisite for nurses in solving clinical problems. However, existing research on IB among clinical nurses is relatively limited.
objectiveTo identify profiles and characteristics of IB among clinical nurses and explore the associated predictors, as well as the relationships with research outputs.
methodsA multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on 354 clinical nurses in Shanghai from April 2023 to May 2023 (response rate 98.06%). IB was measured by the Innovative Behavior Scale for Nurses (IBSN), future time perspective was measured by the Future Time Perspective Scale (FTPS), and work engagement was measured by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (UWES-9). Socio-demographic and professional data and research output indicators were measured by a self-designed questionnaire. We used latent profile analysis (LPA) by Mplus 7.0 to identify latent classes of IB. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the relevant predictors on the different profiles. And then Pearson's chi-squared was used to analyze the association between IB level and research output.
resultsAmong the respondents, individuals aged 25 to 35 accounted for 55.9%, and females comprised 94.6%. IB of clinical nurses can be identified into 3 groups: low-level (n = 108, 30.51%), moderate-level (n = 149, 42.09%), and high-level (n = 97, 27.40%) groups. Based on the results of LPA, marital status, education level, work experience, monthly income, night shifts, future time perspective scores, and work engagement scores can be the predictors of IB among different profiles. Statistically significant associations were found between IB level and research productivity, including publishing academic papers (χ
conclusionAccording to our research, clinical nurses have three unique IB profiles. The current level is predominantly at a moderate level, with less than 30% demonstrating a high level of innovation. It revealed that better socio-demographic status and professional characteristics, future time perspective, and work engagement positively influenced innovative behavior among clinical nurses. The findings also highlight the potentially important role of IB in contributing to nurses' research output. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: As far as we know, it might be the first study to employ LPA to clarify the heterogeneity in the levels of IB and their specific distribution among nurses. Our findings may provide a new viewpoint for promoting IB among clinical nurses. Nursing administrators should pay attention to IB of clinical nurses and develop targeted interventions to enhance their IB levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.