ArticleBMC public health2025
Quantitative evaluation of China's public health emergencies response policies: a PMC index model approach.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of hospice and palliative care policies in China: a Theme-Instrument-Effectiveness (TIE) framework based on text analysis.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Evaluating emergency management capabilities and identifying their related factors for public health emergencies in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Empowering chronic disease management with smart healthcare in China: a policy effectiveness evaluation by PMC index model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessment of emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Research on the measurement of China's emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies and their driving factors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Research on China's population health policy: an analysis based on the PMC index model.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Multi-level Supportive Policy Dataset for China's Resource-Based Cities (2003 to 2023).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Evaluation and optimization of municipal-level health impact assessment policies in China based on the PMC index model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The practice of drug emergency supply in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: A policy mix perspective.PloS one · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of China's adolescent physical activity policies: a PMC Index model approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Evaluating long-term care insurance policies in China: an integrated analysis of policy instruments and PMC index model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and Ebola outbreaks, have occurred with increasing frequency worldwide, posing significant threats to global public health security. Policies serve as the foundation and institutional framework for effective emergency responses. Consequently, evaluating and optimizing the formulation and implementation of Public Health Emergency Response Policies (PHERPs) to enhance emergency response capacities has become an urgent and important research priority.
methodsThis study developed an evaluation system for PHERPs using content analysis of policy texts, expert consultations, and the PMC-Index model. It quantitatively analyzed 33 central-level PHERPs in China issued between 2003 and 2020.
resultsThe analysis revealed an average PMC-Index score of 6.43 for the 33 PHERPs. The PMC-Surface analysis highlighted that the top three scoring indicators were policy openness, policy structure, and policy area. In contrast, the lowest-scoring indicators were policy timeliness, issuing agency, and incentive measures.
conclusionsThe study demonstrates was generally good. However, significant variability was observed in the scores of individual indicators across different policies. These findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of PHERPs and offer a reference for optimizing policy design and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.