Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844056›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Joint embedding-classifier learning for interpretable collaborative filtering.

Clémence Réda, Jill-Jênn Vie, Olaf Wolkenhauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clémence RédaInstitute of Computer Science, University of Rostock, 18051, Rostock, Germany. clemence.reda@uni-rostock.de.
Jill-Jênn VieSoda, Inria Saclay, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Olaf WolkenhauerInstitute of Computer Science, University of Rostock, 18051, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101102016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterpretability is a topical question in recommender systems, especially in healthcare applications. An interpretable classifier quantifies the importance of each input feature for the predicted item-user association in a non-ambiguous fashion.

resultsWe introduce the novel Joint Embedding Learning-classifier for improved Interpretability (JELI). By combining the training of a structured collaborative-filtering classifier and an embedding learning task, JELI predicts new user-item associations based on jointly learned item and user embeddings while providing feature-wise importance scores. Therefore, JELI flexibly allows the introduction of priors on the connections between users, items, and features. In particular, JELI simultaneously (a) learns feature, item, and user embeddings; (b) predicts new item-user associations; (c) provides importance scores for each feature. Moreover, JELI instantiates a generic approach to training recommender systems by encoding generic graph-regularization constraints.

conclusionsFirst, we show that the joint training approach yields a gain in the predictive power of the downstream classifier. Second, JELI can recover feature-association dependencies. Finally, JELI induces a restriction in the number of parameters compared to baselines in synthetic and drug-repurposing data sets.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMachine LearningAlgorithmsCollaborative filteringDrug repurposingGene expressionInterpretability

Identifiers

PMID39844056
PMCPMC11755841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.