ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025
Genomic selection strategies to overcome genotype by environment interactions in biosecurity-based aquaculture breeding programs.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFamily-based selective breeding programs typically employ both between-family and within-family selection in aquaculture. However, these programs may exhibit a reduced genetic gain in the presence of a genotype by environment interactions (G × E) when employing biosecurity-based breeding schemes (BS), compared to non-biosecurity-based breeding schemes (NBS). Fortunately, genomic selection shows promise in improving genetic gain by taking within-family variance into account. Stochastic simulation was employed to evaluate genetic gain and G × E trends in BS for improving the body weight of L. vannamei, considering selective genotyping strategies for test group (TG) at a commercial farm environment (CE), the number individuals of the selection group (SG) genotyped at nucleus breeding center (NE), and varying levels of G × E.
resultsThe loss of genetic gain in BS ranged from 9.4 to 38.9% in pedigree-based selection and was more pronounced when G × E was stronger, as quantified by a lower genetic correlation for body weight between NE and CE. Genomic selection, particularly with selective genotyping of TG individuals with extreme performance, effectively offset the loss of genetic gain. With a genetic correlation of 0.8, genotyping 20 SG individuals in each candidate family achieved 93.2% of the genetic gain observed for NBS. However, when the genetic correlation fell below 0.5, the number of genotyped SG individuals per family had to be increased to 50 or more. Genetic gain improved by on average 9.4% when the number of genotyped SG individuals rose from 20 to 50, but the increase in genetic gain averaged only 2.4% when expanding from 50 to 80 individuals genotyped. In addition, the genetic correlation decreased by on average 0.13 over 30 generations of selection when performing BS and the genetic correlation fluctuated across generations.
conclusionsGenomic selection can effectively compensate for the loss of genetic gain in BS due to G × E. However, the number of genotyped SG individuals and the level of G × E significantly affected the extra genetic gain from genomic selection. A family-based BS selective breeding program should monitor the level of G × E and genotyping 50 SG individuals per candidate family to minimize the loss of genetic gain due to G × E, unless the level of G × E is confirmed to be low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.